Explore focused legal workflow prototypes.
Each demo presents a different operational workflow: conveyancing volume, construction litigation complexity, and practice platform intelligence. Use them to guide conversations with lawyers about where automation would be genuinely useful.
Built for high-volume conveyancing firms
Real Estate Closing Command Centre
Turn a purchase contract and intake packet into a closing checklist, missing-doc tracker, tax flags, and realtor/client update stream.
Built for commercial and construction litigators
Construction Litigation Claim Builder
Ingest contracts, change orders, emails, and delay notes to produce a chronology, issue map, damages outline, and discovery questions.
Built as a practice platform integration
Northstar Matter Risk Radar
Scan active matters for missing documents, stale client updates, upcoming deadlines, billing risks, and next best actions.
Real Estate Closing Command Centre
This prototype is designed for high-volume residential real estate practices, with emphasis on fewer staff touches per file, clearer stakeholder communication, and earlier discovery of title, tax, and funding issues.
File: 4888 Cambie Street Purchase
Completion: June 28 | Buyer: Patel Family Trust
Checklist generated from documents
Auto-generated updates
To realtor
We have title and contract review complete. Please send the strata Form B and parking stall confirmation.
To client
Your next step is confirming whether this is a new-build purchase so we can finalize GST treatment.
Workflow considerations
- Which part of the closing process would benefit most from earlier visibility?
- Would a shared status view improve communication with clients, realtors, or lenders?
- What closing risk would this dashboard need to identify before it became useful?
Construction Litigation Claim Builder
Use this prototype with commercial or construction litigators to discuss how raw matter documents could become an early chronology, issue map, and review-ready case summary.
Northgate Builders v. City Works
128 files indexed | 4 issue clusters detected
Claim timeline
Generated outputs
Issue map
Delay, scope creep, notice compliance, mitigation
Damages outline
$284K standby, $91K acceleration, $43K materials
Discovery asks
11 requests tied to missing schedule evidence
Partner memo
2-page first-pass case theory for review
Gap: no written notice found for the March 04 drawing delay. Ask client whether notice was sent outside email.
Workflow considerations
- At what stage of a matter would a litigation team review this kind of summary?
- Which output is most valuable: chronology, damages outline, issue map, or discovery questions?
- Which source documents would be most helpful to include in a first review?
Northstar Matter Risk Radar
This prototype is designed for firms already using a matter management system. It adds a practice-area intelligence layer that turns matter data into recommended next actions.
Breya Radar for Northstar Practice
Mock sync: 142 active matters | 18 actions found
Matter risk queue
Mortgage instructions not received
Limitation date inside 21 days
No client update in 17 days
Trust deposit unreconciled
Next best actions
Create limitation reminder and assign partner review.
Send client update draft for stale active matters.
Flag trust deposit item for accounting review.
Workflow considerations
- Would this be more useful as a platform add-on, firm dashboard, or managed service?
- Which matter types should a risk dashboard support first?
- What matter data would need to be available for this to produce reliable recommendations?
Use the demos to guide practical workflow conversations.
Each prototype is designed to make evaluation concrete: which workflow matters, what data is required, and what a useful first version would need to do.